top of page

South Australia’s misconduct guideline: fair process before disciplinary action

2 hours ago
1 min read

Status and coverage


The Commissioner’s Management of Misconduct guideline operates from 27 April 2026, under section 14(d) of the Public Sector Act 2009. It particularly addresses Part 7 employment, while offering material relevant across the public sector. The official guidelines catalogue confirms that guidelines are not binding. Specific legislation and industrial instruments still matter.


What a fair process requires


The guideline separates investigation from decision-making. Employees should receive sufficiently particular allegations, relevant evidence and a reasonable opportunity to respond. Decision-makers must genuinely consider that response, avoid bias and base findings on evidence. The standard is the balance of probabilities; serious allegations require appropriately cogent evidence, not a different standard of proof.


Correctional workplaces: check the authority


First establish the employee’s legal employment basis and applicable instruments. Do not assume every correctional employee has identical suspension powers, sanctions or review rights. Suspension is not a finding of misconduct. Criminal proceedings and workplace discipline are distinct processes.


Before responding, preserve the allegations, evidence, directions and correspondence; check decision-making authority, response time, proposed sanction and mitigating circumstances. Obtain timely advice about applicable review avenues.



 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
South Australia: Understanding the overpayment FAQ

Version checked: 22 January 2026. The Commissioner’s overpayment FAQ is explanatory material accompanying Determination 6, not a replacement for the determination or legislation. It explains agency re

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page