Charles Perkins and the 1965 Freedom Ride: The Road That Forced Australia to Look at Itself
- Brian AJ Newman LLB
- 2 days ago
- 16 min read
The life of an Arrernte and Kalkadoon leader who confronted segregation, exposed racism and helped change the national conversation about Aboriginal rights
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander readers are advised that this article contains the name and images of a person who has died.
There are moments in history when a country is forced to look at itself.
For Australia, February 1965 was one of those moments.
A bus carrying Charles Perkins and a group of University of Sydney students travelled through regional New South Wales. They surveyed living conditions, spoke with Aboriginal communities, challenged segregation and deliberately brought journalists and cameras with them.
The journey became known as the 1965 Freedom Ride.
It lasted only a matter of weeks.
Its consequences lasted generations.
At its centre was a young Arrernte and Kalkadoon man named Charles Nelson Perkins — a footballer, university student, organiser and Aboriginal activist who was prepared to confront racism directly rather than politely ask those practising it to reconsider.
At Walgett, the students challenged the exclusion of Aboriginal ex-servicemen from the RSL.
At Moree, they confronted a municipal colour bar preventing Aboriginal children from using the town swimming pool.
At other towns they documented housing inequality, employment discrimination and segregation in hotels, cinemas and public facilities.
Sometimes they were abused.
Sometimes they were threatened.
At Walgett, their bus was forced from the road.
At Moree, protesters were struck and pelted with eggs and tomatoes.
But the cameras were there.
Australia could see what was happening.
That was one of the great achievements of the Freedom Ride: it made discrimination visible to Australians who had been permitted not to see it.
The Commonwealth's own heritage assessment now describes the Moree events as a defining moment in Australian race relations which forced the wider Australian community to confront the treatment of Aboriginal people.
Before the Freedom Ride
Charles Perkins was born in 1936 at the Bungalow at the Alice Springs Telegraph Station Aboriginal Reserve.
His mother was Eastern Arrernte. He would become known publicly as an Arrernte and Kalkadoon man.
When he was about ten years old, his mother made the extraordinarily difficult decision to allow him to travel to St Francis House in Adelaide, recognising the very limited educational opportunities available to him in Alice Springs.
Perkins therefore grew up with racism not as an academic subject, but as lived experience.
The Australian Heritage Database recounts one particularly painful experience from his youth. As a teenager attending a dance at the Port Adelaide Town Hall, Perkins approached girls and asked them to dance. He was repeatedly rejected because he was Aboriginal.
He later described the experience as something that damaged his confidence and self-respect.
Those experiences matter when considering what happened at Moree years later.
When Perkins confronted a swimming-pool manager refusing Aboriginal children admission, he was not examining discrimination from a distance.
He knew what racial exclusion felt like.
Football, England and a wider world
Perkins was also an exceptional soccer player.
His ability took him to England in 1957, where he trialled with Everton.
The Australian Heritage material records that he was offered a position but rejected it because of his treatment at the club, ultimately playing for Bishop Auckland instead.
He returned to Australia in 1958, married Eileen Munchenberg, and continued playing soccer.
He became captain-coach of Adelaide Croatia and later Sydney Pan-Hellenic, using his football income to help finance his education.
Football gave Perkins opportunities that Australian society frequently denied Aboriginal people.
It also exposed him to a wider world.
He had travelled.
He had experienced life outside Australia.
He had seen racism from different perspectives.
And he increasingly understood that the treatment of Aboriginal people in Australia was not something that should simply be accepted as inevitable.
Sydney University and Student Action for Aborigines
In 1963, Perkins entered the University of Sydney.
He became increasingly involved in campaigns against racial discrimination and segregation.
The political environment was changing internationally.
The American civil-rights movement was confronting segregation.
Images of police violence against Black protesters in the United States were being broadcast around the world.
The struggle against apartheid in South Africa was increasingly prominent.
Australian students were protesting those injustices overseas.
But an uncomfortable question followed:
What about racism in Australia?
The Australian Heritage Database records that criticism was directed at Australian students for protesting American racial discrimination while failing to adequately confront the treatment of Aboriginal people in their own country.
That challenge helped produce something important.
In July 1964, Student Action for Aborigines — SAFA — was established at the University of Sydney, with Perkins as its Aboriginal chairman.
Its members came from a range of university political, religious and social organisations.
They began preparing for something far more ambitious than another campus meeting.
They would take a bus into regional Australia.
This was not simply a bus tour
The plan was remarkably sophisticated.
The Freedom Riders intended to:
investigate racial discrimination in country towns;
conduct social surveys;
document Aboriginal housing and living conditions;
examine inequalities in health and education;
identify segregation in businesses and public facilities;
support Aboriginal people already challenging discrimination;
conduct peaceful demonstrations where clear discrimination could be established; and
use newspapers, radio and television to place the evidence before the Australian public.
The Heritage Database records that the students consciously adopted non-violent resistance, influenced by Martin Luther King Jr and the American civil-rights movement.
They prepared carefully.
Fundraisers were organised.
Students contributed money.
They received briefings.
They developed reading lists.
People experienced in Aboriginal affairs provided information about particular towns.
Perkins himself brought considerable practical knowledge.
During the summer he had worked with the Foundation for Aboriginal Affairs, dealing with Aboriginal job seekers, families facing eviction and people trying to access social services.
He knew that what the students were about to investigate was real.
The road north
Late on 12 February 1965, Charles Perkins and 29 other students climbed aboard a hired bus and left Sydney.
Their journey would cover approximately 3,200 kilometres before they returned on 26 February.
Their early stops included Wellington and Gulargambone.
The students conducted surveys and examined living conditions.
The conditions confronting Aboriginal families were often appalling.
But SAFA's strategy was not simply to stage demonstrations everywhere they went.
They wanted sufficient evidence of a specific discriminatory practice before acting.
That distinction matters.
This was advocacy based on investigation.
They gathered evidence first.
Then, where the evidence justified it, they challenged the practice.
At Walgett, they found what they were looking for.
Walgett: “Good enough for Tobruk — why not Walgett RSL?”
The Freedom Riders discovered significant segregation in Walgett.
According to the Australian Heritage Database, the cinema, RSL club, hotels and even a clothing shop practised racial discrimination.
Most striking was the treatment of Aboriginal returned servicemen.
Aboriginal men had served Australia during war.
They had faced the same enemy fire.
They had worn the same uniform.
Yet Aboriginal veterans could be denied membership of the local RSL.
The Freedom Riders picketed the club.
This was an extraordinarily powerful argument.
The RSL represented service, sacrifice, comradeship and national identity.
The Freedom Riders exposed the contradiction.
Australia could ask an Aboriginal man to defend the country.
But once his uniform came off, the colour bar returned.
The demonstration angered sections of the white community.
Even the church hall in which the students were staying was withdrawn from them after their protest.
Then matters became dangerous.
When the bus left Walgett at night, vehicles followed it.
A truck attempted to force the bus from the road.
On the third attempt it struck the bus, forcing it down an embankment.
No one was seriously injured.
But the incident demonstrated the hostility the students had provoked simply by publicly challenging racism.
There is another important part of that story.
Some of the vehicles following the bus belonged to Aboriginal community members who were attempting to escort and protect the students from hostile local residents.
That detail should never be forgotten.
The Freedom Ride was not a story of university students arriving to rescue Aboriginal people.
Aboriginal people were already resisting.
The Freedom Riders amplified that resistance and helped force it into national view.
The media becomes part of the campaign
Initially, Walgett received relatively limited media attention.
Then journalist Bruce Maxwell reported on what had happened.
The story began spreading.
Newspapers became interested.
Radio became interested.
Television became interested.
The Freedom Ride was becoming national news.
That would become critical at the next major stop.
Moree.
Moree: the confrontation that changed the Freedom Ride
Moree became the defining confrontation of the journey.
Racial discrimination occurred in employment, hotels and other areas of community life.
But the Freedom Riders focused on the Moree swimming baths.
A local rule prevented Aboriginal people from using the baths, apart from limited circumstances involving schoolchildren during school hours.
This was not merely a rude shopkeeper or an individual racist attitude.
The colour bar operated through municipal authority.
Local councillor Bob Brown had already attempted to have the discriminatory rule changed.
He could not even obtain a seconder for his motion.
The Freedom Riders therefore joined a struggle that was already occurring locally.
They protested at the council chambers and then attempted to take Aboriginal children into the pool.
After an argument, the mayor allowed the children to enter.
That evening, the students held a public meeting and presented the results of their investigations.
The atmosphere was initially hostile.
But something changed during the discussion.
A motion supporting removal of the segregation rule passed.
The students believed they had achieved a breakthrough.
They left Moree.
Then the colour bar returned.
They turned the bus around
After the Freedom Riders departed, Bob Brown again attempted to take Aboriginal children into the baths.
They were refused.
The pool was closed.
An emergency council meeting followed.
The discriminatory rule was again enforced.
Brown contacted the Freedom Riders.
By then Perkins had travelled to Sydney for a television interview.
The students had to decide what to do.
They could continue their planned route.
Or they could return to Moree.
They turned the bus around.
Perkins rejoined them at Inverell.
The Heritage Database records that he regarded Moree as the place where a genuine breakthrough could be achieved.
That decision became one of the defining moments of his life.
Three hours at the gate
The Freedom Riders returned to the pool with Aboriginal children.
For approximately three hours they attempted to gain entry.
A large crowd gathered.
The atmosphere became increasingly hostile.
Eggs were thrown.
Tomatoes were thrown.
Students were knocked over.
At least one was punched.
Fights erupted.
Police made arrests.
And the media recorded it.
This is where the Freedom Ride achieved something greater than the admission of children to a swimming pool.
Australia saw the reaction produced when Aboriginal people and their supporters simply demanded equal access to a public facility.
The Australian Heritage Database records that media reports compared the violence with scenes from the American South.
Eventually Moree mayor Bill Lloyd came to the baths and indicated that he would support rescinding the discriminatory rule.
The Freedom Riders accepted the assurance.
They left Moree under police escort.
Eggs and tomatoes continued to be thrown at the bus as it departed.
It was never only about swimming
Moree is sometimes remembered as though the Freedom Ride was principally a campaign to allow Aboriginal children into a swimming pool.
That understates what happened.
The swimming pool represented something much larger.
It asked whether an Aboriginal child could approach the entrance of a municipal facility and expect the same treatment as a white child.
It asked whether a local authority could legitimately establish a colour bar.
It asked whether Aboriginal people belonged within the civic life of the towns in which they lived.
It asked whether government statements about equality meant anything when everyday practice remained segregated.
The Commonwealth's heritage assessment describes Moree as a place where the contradiction between official rhetoric and lived reality was publicly exposed.
That is why the Moree Baths were placed on the National Heritage List in 2013.
The site is not nationally significant because of swimming.
It is significant because Australians fought there over the meaning of equality.
Bowraville, Kempsey and the colour bar elsewhere
The journey continued through northern New South Wales.
The Freedom Riders visited coastal towns including Grafton, Lismore, Coffs Harbour, Bowraville and Kempsey.
Again they surveyed conditions.
Again they identified discrimination.
Again they protested where appropriate.
The reactions were not always as violent as Moree.
But the pattern was becoming undeniable.
What the students had encountered was not an isolated dispute in one town.
Segregation and racial discrimination were woven through many aspects of regional Australian life.
The Freedom Ride material records discrimination involving swimming pools, entertainment venues, businesses and other public facilities throughout the journey.
The camera was one of their most important tools
The Freedom Ride is also an important lesson in advocacy.
Perkins and SAFA understood that establishing injustice was only part of the task.
People had to see it.
Journalists had to report it.
Photographers had to capture it.
Radio had to discuss it.
Television had to take Moree and Walgett into living rooms in Sydney, Melbourne and elsewhere.
Today we might call that strategic communications.
In 1965 it was equally deliberate.
The purpose was to destroy the ability of mainstream Australia to say:
We didn't know.
That remains one of the most important aspects of Perkins' advocacy.
When an institution denies that discrimination exists, evidence matters.
When discrimination occurs behind closed doors, exposure matters.
When those affected by a system are ignored, public scrutiny matters.
The Freedom Ride combined all three.
The 1967 Referendum
The Freedom Ride did not create the Aboriginal rights movement.
Nor did Charles Perkins begin the struggle for Aboriginal justice.
Aboriginal people had resisted dispossession, state control and discrimination for generations.
Leaders and organisations had campaigned for citizenship, land, political rights and equality long before 1965.
And the campaign that led to the 1967 Referendum involved many Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal activists and organisations over many years.
But the Freedom Ride mattered.
The Australian Government's heritage assessment says the Moree protests were an important contributor to the changing climate of opinion that preceded the referendum.
By exposing racial discrimination so publicly, the Freedom Ride made the national contradiction harder to ignore.
What the Freedom Ride achieved
The immediate victories were important.
Some discriminatory practices were challenged.
Some barriers fell.
Local campaigns gained momentum.
Aboriginal communities received greater national attention.
But the larger achievement was political and psychological.
The Freedom Ride exposed the gulf between the Australia the nation imagined itself to be and the Australia experienced by Aboriginal people.
The Heritage Database concludes that the campaign helped demonstrate that segregation and discrimination remained endemic in many regional towns and that some discrimination was officially sanctioned.
It also records longer-term consequences.
The Freedom Ride contributed to the changing national environment preceding the 1967 Referendum.
It encouraged Aboriginal people in some communities to challenge discrimination.
And it forms part of the historical trajectory that ultimately produced stronger Commonwealth involvement in Aboriginal affairs and federal racial-discrimination legislation.
The official heritage assessment describes the Freedom Ride as one of those transitional moments when one historical era began giving way to another.
That is an extraordinary legacy for a bus journey lasting less than two weeks.
Charles Perkins did not stop in 1965
The Freedom Ride made Perkins nationally recognisable.
But it was not the end of his work.
It was closer to the beginning.
He continued his involvement in Aboriginal organisations and played an important role in the Foundation for Aboriginal Affairs.
He later combined activism with public administration.
The SBS retrospective records that Perkins became the first Indigenous senior executive in the Australian Public Service, subsequently held senior departmental leadership positions, chaired the Aboriginal Development Commission and later served as an ATSIC Commissioner.
He did something difficult throughout that career.
He worked inside institutions without surrendering his willingness to criticise them.
That combination sometimes came at a personal cost.
But it was consistent with the method that Australians first saw clearly at Moree:
confront people with truths they would prefer not to hear.
The Australian Heritage assessment specifically identifies this characteristic as one that emerged publicly at Moree and continued throughout Perkins' life, even when the consequences were personally difficult.
Culture, family and the man behind the public figure
The public Perkins was combative, articulate and frequently controversial.
But his life cannot be reduced to public confrontation.
He was a husband.
A father.
A footballer.
An Arrernte man.
The SBS retrospective records that at age 55 he was initiated as an Arrernte wadi, described as a man at the beginning of his cultural journey.
He also lived for decades with serious kidney disease.
A donated kidney extended his life by almost 30 years and allowed him to continue his advocacy.
When Perkins died from complications associated with renal failure on 18 October 2000, his wife Eileen and children Hetti, Rachel and Adam faced an enormous national outpouring of grief.
Perkins was given a State Funeral at Sydney Town Hall on 25 October 2000.
He was 64.
The SBS retrospective records the words of Aboriginal leader Christine Williams, who remembered that Perkins “walked alongside his people, not above them.”
That may be one of the most important descriptions of his leadership.
A champion of champions
The SBS remembrance describes Perkins as a “champion of champions.”
That description is fitting, but his importance lies in more than the offices he held.
Perkins mattered because he refused to accept that Aboriginal people should wait quietly for equality.
He understood that racism could exist in legislation.
It could exist in council rules.
It could exist in clubs.
It could exist in employment.
It could exist in public administration.
And it could exist in ordinary social behaviour that had become so normal that those practising it no longer felt the need to justify themselves.
He also understood that institutions rarely surrender discriminatory practices simply because someone politely tells them those practices are wrong.
Sometimes injustice must be exposed.
Sometimes the person responsible must be confronted.
Sometimes evidence must be taken outside the institution and placed before the wider community.
That was the method of the Freedom Ride.
The enduring image of Moree
More than sixty years later, there remains something deeply disturbing about the images from Moree.
Not because Aboriginal children were demanding something extraordinary.
Quite the opposite.
They wanted to swim.
Children should never have required civil-rights activists, university students, journalists, police, councillors and a national political controversy simply to enter a municipal swimming pool.
But that is precisely why the image remains so important.
The swimming pool was ordinary.
The discrimination was ordinary.
That was the problem.
Racism had become embedded in everyday Australian life to such an extent that excluding Aboriginal children could be defended as normal.
Perkins challenged that normality.
The bus carried a mirror
Perhaps the best way to understand the Freedom Ride is to imagine that the students carried something more powerful than protest placards.
They carried a mirror.
They held that mirror up to Walgett.
They held it up to Moree.
They held it up to Bowraville.
They held it up to Kempsey.
And through newspaper photographs, radio reports and television coverage, they eventually held it up to Australia.
The reflection was uncomfortable.
It showed an Australia in which Aboriginal servicemen could defend the nation but be excluded from an RSL.
An Australia in which Aboriginal children could live in a town but be excluded from its swimming pool.
An Australia that condemned racial segregation overseas while tolerating it at home.
Charles Perkins did not create those contradictions.
He exposed them.
And once exposed, they became much harder to deny.
Why Charles Perkins still matters
The Freedom Ride is not simply a story from 1965.
It remains a lesson for anyone engaged in human-rights advocacy today.
Investigate before alleging.
Gather evidence.
Listen to the people experiencing the discrimination.
Identify the institution responsible.
Challenge the practice directly.
Use public scrutiny where private processes fail.
Do not confuse discomfort with injustice.
And above all:
never allow an institution to convince us that discrimination should be tolerated merely because it has existed for a long time.
Charles Perkins understood that progress often begins when somebody refuses to accept the answer they have been given.
That is what happened at Moree.
The colour bar was reinstated.
The Freedom Riders were told, in effect, that the matter was finished.
They turned the bus around.
There is something enduring in that decision.
Turn the bus around
When injustice remains after the meeting ends—
turn the bus around.
When a commitment to equality disappears once public attention moves elsewhere—
turn the bus around.
When an institution says the problem has been resolved but the people affected tell you otherwise—
turn the bus around.
When discrimination has become normalised—
turn the bus around.
Go back.
Ask again.
Produce the evidence.
Stand at the gate.
Make the institution explain itself.
Make the country look.
That is part of the legacy of Dr Charles Nelson Perkins AO.
Arrernte and Kalkadoon man.
Footballer.
Student.
Freedom Rider.
Activist.
Public servant.
Father.
Leader.
A man who confronted Australia with uncomfortable truths — and helped change what Australians were prepared to accept.
Image and publication notes
The visual material supplied for this article should be used throughout the blog rather than placed in a single gallery. In addition to the individually uploaded historical images, the source documents contain several useful photographs and graphics:
SBS remembrance, page 1: the dual black-and-white portrait of Perkins — recommended as the hero image.
SBS remembrance, page 3: the handwritten family statement prepared following his death — recommended for the section dealing with October 2000.
SBS remembrance, page 5: Perkins photographed in later life — recommended for the public-service and legacy section.
Australian Heritage Database, page 1: the group of photographs showing the Moree Baths complex, its entrance and a historic image of Perkins — recommended as a gallery immediately before the Moree account.
Freedom Ride source, page 1: the header montage incorporating a Perkins portrait, Freedom Ride imagery and historical bus imagery — suitable as a section divider or supplementary image.
Freedom Ride source, page 1: the American Freedom Riders book cover — use when explaining the origin of the name.
Freedom Ride source, page 1: the Student Action for Aborigines protest photograph — use in the SAFA section.
Freedom Ride source, page 1: the Walgett protest/placard photograph — use with the RSL discussion.
Freedom Ride source, pages 1–2: the route map — use full width before the town-by-town account.
Freedom Ride source, page 2: the Getting in the swim! cartoon — use in the Moree section.
Freedom Ride source, page 2: the Violence Explodes in Racist Town newspaper headline — use immediately after the description of the violence at Moree.
Freedom Ride source, page 3: the Vote Yes for Aboriginal Rights photograph — use in the referendum section.
Freedom Ride source, page 3: the YES for Aborigines child campaign poster — place beside or immediately following the referendum photograph.
Where the same historical image appears both inside a PDF and as one of the separate image files supplied for the blog, use the separate higher-quality image rather than reproducing the screenshot from the webpage.
Important: original photographers, archives, publishers and source credits should be retained wherever they are known, and reproduction rights should be confirmed before publication. The images are historically important, but inclusion in a webpage or research source does not necessarily mean the underlying photograph is free of copyright restrictions.
Principal sources used for this article
Australian Heritage Database — Moree Baths and Swimming Pool, National Heritage List. Particularly important for the historical chronology of SAFA, Walgett, Moree, the national significance of the Moree confrontation and the relationship between the Freedom Ride and the changing national climate surrounding Aboriginal rights.
“Remembering Dr Charles Perkins 25 years after his death.” Used for Perkins' later public-service career, family, cultural life, kidney transplant, death, State Funeral and contemporary reflections on his legacy.
“Charles Perkins and the Freedom Rides.” Used principally for the Freedom Ride route, visual material, stated campaign objectives, media strategy and associated historical campaign images.
Comments